"Foes Attack Bid to Renew Oyster Creek Nuclear License", The New York Times,ÊFebruary 21, 2004, p. B5]
* The [Oyster Creek license extension application] filing is due by April 9, 2004, but the
company will file late, sometime in 2005, giving up its right to remain open if the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission is still reviewing the application in 2009. Historically, the NRC takes
17 to 22 months to decide on a renewal application. [Source: Jarrett Renshaw (staff writer, Press of Atlantic City), Oyster Creek N-plant seeks license extension until 2029", Press of Atlantic City (NJ), February 20, 2004]
* If the company [AmerGen Energy] decided against renewal, or if it is denied, it would begin
the 10-year decommissioning process [for Oyster Creek]. NRC officials said jobs would not be
lost during the process, but the economic impact would be felt over time. [Source: Jarrett Renshaw (staff writer, Press of Atlantic City), Oyster Creek N-plant seeks license extension until 2029", Press of Atlantic City (NJ), February 20, 2004]
December 31, 2003
Oyster Creek physical mods over the years - it has been dramatically changed
"While OCNGS has been in operation since December 1969, over
the years, the licensee has replaced many pieces of equipment and performed overhauls of
other plant equipment. The licensee has also installed new, more modern systems to replace
or supplement original systems that are obsolete or no longer considered adequate. Thus,
while the plant is thirty-four years old, it has dramatically changed over its operational
lifetime."
[Source: Cornelius F. Holden, Jr (Director, NRC/NRR Division of Licensing Project Management,
Project Directorate I), letter in reply to Township
Committee of Ocean Resolution No. 2003-317, requesting Oyster creek be decommissioned in April 2004,
December 31, 2003. ML033650147]
Local governments urge early decommissioning
In addition to the resolution from the Township Committee of Ocean which prompted the NRC
letter cited above, a similar resolution was passed by the Berkeley Township
Council. NRC's reply to Berkeley Council [ML033650167] includes more details than the letter to Ocean Committee, including explanation of defense-in-depth as it applies to spent fuel pools.
Summary of Plant Status - September 29, 2003 - December 31, 2003
Oyster Creek began the period at 98% Rated Thermal Power (RTP) due to ongoing leak repair
maintenance on the second stage feedwater heater valves. Full RTP was achieved on October
3, 2003. Power was reduced again to 96% RTP on October 23, 2003, to support leak repair to
a second stage heater drain tank level transmitter isolation valve and full RTP operation was
achieved later that same day. Power was reduced to about 50% RTP on November 13, 2003,
due to low intake water level and grass accumulation on the circulation water traveling screens
caused by unusual high wind conditions. On November 16, 2003, full RTP was achieved and
the plant operated at or near full RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
[Source: Robert Summers (senior resident inspector) et al., Inspection at Oyster Creek Generating Station
conducted September 29, 2003 - December 31, 2003, NRC Region I inspection report 05000219/2003005, February 12, 2004, p. 1]
November 20, 2003
Transnuclear NUHOMS 61BT cask CoC amended to allow use with damaged BWR fuel
The Executive Director for Operations (EDO) approved a proposed rule
which revises 10 CFR Part 72.214, ÒList of approved spent fuel storage casks,Ó for the
Transnuclear, Inc., Standardized NUHOMS ¨ Horizontal Modular Storage System (Standardized
NUHOMS ¨ System) to include Amendment No. 7 in Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number
1004. Amendment No. 7 which will incorporate changes in support of the Amergen Corporation
plans to load damaged fuel and additional fuel types at its Oyster Creek Nuclear Station.
Specifically, the amendment will add damaged Boiling Water Reactor spent fuel assemblies
and additional fuel types to the authorized contents of the NUHOMS ¨ -61BT Dry Shielded
Canister under a general license. In addition, the amendment includes three minor changes to
the Technical Specifications to correct inconsistencies and remove irrelevant references.
[Source: NRC/NMSS, in NRC Office of EDO, "Weekly Information Report, Week Ending November 21, 2003", SECY-03-0207,
December 1, 2003, ACN ML033360224]
August 22, 2003
* Oyster Creek - reactor trip; one control rod might not have fully inserted
August 8, 2003
*
Oyster Creek union accepts contract offer
Andrew Johnson, The Press of Atlantic City --
Rather than getting a better contract by striking, Oyster Creek workers voted to accept a contract that wasn't as good as the one offered by the company before the strike. Unions across the country are surely looking at this case for lessons learned and strategies for dealing with the huge nuclear operating companies. No crystal ball needed to imagine the coming efforts to take strikes nationwide. This is not good news for an industry looking to grow. Entergy management may have been too clever by half in crushing the little union local at Oyster Creek.
July 1, 2003
State considers possible criminal aspect of Oyster Creek fish kill event
In early June, four Oyster Creek workers alleged that, back in September, plant management ignored their warning that the
maintenance to be performed on outflow dilution structure would likely result in significant fish kill.
Local newspaper today reports that "One of the workers, Bill Timmons, said last week that he and other workers were recently
interviewed about the incident by investigators with the state Division of Criminal Justice.
... "Based on the new information, we have decided to reopen our review," John Hagerty, spokesman
for the state Attorney General's Office, said Monday... Such a review determines whether the state thinks it justified to launch a
formal criminal investigation.
The article notes that Oyster Creek management "acknowledged that mistakes were made, but vigorously denied
the workers' allegations that they deliberately chose to turn off a dilution pump knowing that
a massive fish kill was likely. In a corrective action plan, plant management cited as causes of the fish kill 'a less than
vigorous' approach to complying with state environmental law; 'inaccurate risk perceptions' and
'mental shortcuts'."
[Ref: Jim McElhatton, "
Attorney GeneralÕs Office reopens inquiry on Oyster Creek fish kill", The Press of Atlantic City, July 1, 2003]
June 11, 2003
New Jersey having tough time balancing parkway asthetics with such things as affordable electricity and avoiding brownouts
New Jersey, at risk of electrical brownouts by next year,
is having problems siting a needed power line upgrade from Oyster Creek nuclear plant. The utility wants to run above-ground line along Garden State Parkway, but highway authority wants only underground lines, which cost 6X more. The only other alternative is to traverse residential areas, which public opposes.
[Source: Dan P. Lee (Staff Writer, The Press of Atlantic City),
"BPU head won't rule out Conectiv plan", The Press of Atlantic City, June 11, 2003]
June 10, 2003
Oyster Creek union may be in for very hard time
There's an apparent impasse between union and management
involving the 217 members of the IBEW amongst Oyster Creek's 450 workers. Contract negotiations began
about a year ago, and the workers went out on strike on May 22. AmerGen has been able to use
it's own nuclear staff from other sites to replace the striking workers. The company has even withdrawn
the last and best offer.
[Source: Andrew Johnson (Staff Writer, The Press of Atlantic City),
"Striking union N-plant workers set rally today", The Press of Atlantic City, June 10, 2003]
The $200,000 hard drive glitch
Oyster Creek spent $200,000 upgrading the emergency siren
system, prompted by hard drive problem that delayed siren use by minutes about three months ago.
Part of the new system is redundancy provided by equipment located at State Police headquarters.
[Source: Andrew Johnson (Staff Writer, The Press of Atlantic City),
"Oyster Creek plant to test new sirens", The Press of Atlantic City, June 10, 2003]
June 7, 2003
* Oyster Creek - company and union meet for first time since strike began, but negotiations moved backwards instead of progressing
* Oyster Creek - union cites safety implications of sweeping workplace rule changes desired by AmerGen
May 21, 2003
Oyster Creek electrical problem prompts forced outage
Oyster Creek is in its first unscheduled outage since November 2001. Power was lost to half the plant's vital equipment at approximately 12:30 am Tuesday, due to a malfunction in an electrical bus. Operators manually shut down the plant at that time. Plant vice president Ernest Harkness declined to estimate when the plant would restart.
[Source: Associated Press,
Oyster Creek nuclear plant shut down after power interruption>, May 21, 2003]